BACTERIAL PROFILE AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE PATTERN OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS Barate D. L. and Ukesh C.S.
Department of Microbiology, Shri Shivaji College of Arts, Commerce and Science, Akola-444001 M.S., India
ABSTRACT Urinary tract infections remain a major medical problem occurring frequently and worldwide. Urinary tract infections are one of the most important reasons for increased morbidity and healthcare expenditure. In present study 71(67.61%) women get affected by UTI while that of men the no. is 34(32.38%) which shows that women are more prone to UTI than men. The Escherichia coli were found to be the predominant organism (49.52%) followed by the Klebsiellapneumoniae (20.95%), Pseudomonasaeruginosa (15.23%), Proteus spp. (9.52%) and Staphylococcus aureus (6.66%). The present study showed that most of the uropathogens were highly resistant to Ampicillin and Amoxyclav while resistance pattern to the other antibiotics vary with the organisms. It is quite serious problem that most of the uropathogens included in study showed multiple drug resistance. KEY WORDS: multiple drug resistance, Urinary tract infections, uropathogens INTRODUCTION Urinary tract infection (UTI) defines a condition in which the urinary tract is infected with a pathogen causing inflammation. Infection of the urinary tract is a common, distressing and occasionally life threatening condition. The clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, complications and long term significance vary depending upon the site of infection and various factors. UTI is one of the most common diseases, occurring from the neonate up to the geriatric age group. It also contributes the most common nosocomial infection in many hospitals and accounts for approximately 35% of all hospital acquired infections. It also responsible for increased morbidity and economic cost. Bacteria are the primary organisms that cause UTI. Among all, Gram negative bacteria are predominant and accounts for 80-85% while Gram positive for 15-20%. Escherichia coli is the frequent pathogen but in complicated UTI the prevalence of other antibiotic resistant organisms increases such as Klebsiella, Proteus, Serretia, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, S. aureus, Bacillus etc.(Nadia et al.,2004). Increasing antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens is of worldwide concern. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in both out and hospitalized patients with UTI is increasing and can vary according to geographical and regional locations (Khan and Zaman, 2006). This is due to the fact that antibiotics are given empirically before the laboratory results of urine culture are available to ensure the appropriate therapy (Khadri, 2009). In order to treat UTI with a rational empirical therapy, it is necessary to identify the bacterial spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibilities of the uropathogens. (Shigemura et al., 2005). The present study is one of the approaches to know the trends of occurrence and resistance pattern among the uropathogens in the Akola city. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study includes examination of 135 samples of urine from urinary tract infected patients of various hospitals. Fresh midstream urine samples were collected in sterile containers. Each sample was inoculated on Cystein Lactose Electrolyte Deficient agar plates using a calibrated loop delivering 0.01ml of the sample. The plates were incubated at 37oC for18-24hrs. The plates showing >105 CFU/ml were considered as significant bacteriuria as per the Kass count (Kass, 1956). Further the uropathogens were identified by their morphological and biochemical characteristics. The antibiotic sensitivity of isolated uropathogens was tested using Muller Hinton agar by Kirby-Bauer method. The antibiotics used for the study were Ampicillin (10mcg), Amoxyclav (30mcg), Tetracycline (30mcg), Cephalexin (10mcg), Norfloxacin (10mcg), Ciprofloxacin (5mcg), Gentamycin (10mcg), Erythromycin (15mcg), Chloramphenicol (30mcg), Nalidixic acid (30mcg), Nitrofurantoin (50mcg). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The 135 samples collected, 30 samples were excluded from study due to contamination and some with insignificant bacteriuria. A total of 105 samples analyzed in the study shows 71(67.61%) of women get affected by UTI while that of men the no. is 34(32.38%) which shows that women are more prone to UTI than men. The results shown in the Table 1-3 and Figure 1-3. The table 1 shows the data of age and sex wise distribution of UTI in different groups. In our study more incidences were found for age group more than 40 years. This might be due to various physiological and immunological changes occur in this age persons. DAV International Journal of Science Volume-1, Issue-1 January, 2012
ISSN: 2277-5536 (Print); 2277-5641 (Online)
Table- 1. Age and sex wise distribution of 105 cases of UTI. Age group Total No. Female (%) Table- 2. Organisms isolated from urine samples Name of Organism Frequency Percent (%) Table-3. Antibiotic resistance pattern among uropathogens % of isolates resistance to antibiotics Antibiotics Escherichia Klebsiella Pseudomonas Proteus Staphylococcus coli pneumoniae aeruginosa aureus Age and sex wise distribution of UTI No. of patients 15 Age group Figure- 1. Age and sex wise distribution of 105 cases of UTI. DAV International Journal of Science Volume-1, Issue-1 January, 2012
ISSN: 2277-5536 (Print); 2277-5641 (Online)
Bacterial profile of uropathogens ercent P 10 Organisms from urine samples Figure-2. Bacterial profile of uropathogens. Antibiotic resistance pattern among uropathogens ates resistant Antibiotics Figure-3. Antibiotic resistance pattern among uropathogens. In our study the bacterial profile of prevalent uropathogens causing UTI also studied and is shown into table 2. The Escherichia coli were found to be the predominant organism (50; 49.52) followed by the Klebsiellapneumoniae (22; 20.95), Pseudomonasaeruginosa (16; 15.23), Proteus spp. (10; 9.52) and Staphylococcus aureus (07; 6.66). The antibiotic resistance pattern amongst the isolated uropathogens were also determined and depicted in table 3. Results showed that Ecoli,Klebsiella and Pseudomonas werehighly resistant to most of the antibiotics used such as Ampicillin, Amoxyclav, Tetracycline, Cephalexin, Norfloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamycin, Erythromycin, Chloramphenicol, Nalidixic acid, Nitrofurantoin. Few of the isolates of Klebsiellapneumoniae had less resistance to Nitrofurantoin, Norfloxacin, Ciprofloxacin and Chloramphenicol. While in some isolates of Pseudomonas showed less resistance towards Gentamycin, Chloramphenicol and Ciprofloxacin. Among Proteus spp. high resistance were found against Ampicillin, Amoxyclav, Cephalexin and Nitrofurantoin while in Gram positive S. aureus maximum resistance were found to Ampicillin, Amoxyclav, Cephalexin and less resistance towards other antibiotics. DISCUSSION Urinary tract infections are mainly due to the invasion of pathogens belonging to the family Enterobacteriacae into the urethra bladder and kidneys. The prevalence of UTI is higher among women than men and was reported by various studies (Khan etal.2004; Kumar et al. 2006). Our studies also showed higher i.e. 67% of women affected by UTI. This might be due to the anatomical predisposition. E. coli was found to be the most predominant (49.52%) organism followed by Klebsiellapneumoniae (20.95%) causing UTI in our study which also in concordance with the study of Tankhiwale et. al. which reported E. coli 49.8% and Klebsiella37.8%. The other organisms as Proteus spp. and S. aureus was found to be 9.52% and 6.66% respectively which also observed to be similar with other (Hussain et al., 2005). Antibiotic resistance is a major clinical problem in treating infections caused by these microorganisms. The resistance to the antimicrobials has increased over the years DAV International Journal of Science Volume-1, Issue-1 January, 2012
ISSN: 2277-5536 (Print); 2277-5641 (Online)
and the resistance rates vary from country to country (Gales, 2001). Our data demonstrated that E. coli and Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin i.e. 83% and 81% respectively. These findings are similar to the previous findings (Kahlmeter, 2003; Khadri, 2009). In this study E. coli were resistant to most of the antibiotics as Ampicillin, Amoxyclav, Tetracycline, Cephalexin, Gentamycin, Nalidixic acid Nitrofurantoin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin which in concordance with other studies (Khan et al., 2006; Rawat et al., 2010). Klebsiellapneumoniae was also exceedingly resistant to Ampicillin (81%) and Amoxyclav (88%) This high resistance to these drugs also seen in other studies of Akram et al. (2007) and Manjunath et al. (2011).
Pseudomonasaeruginosa Showed different patterns of resistance than that of the other organisms more resistance was seen for Ampicillin (90%), Amoxyclav (70%), Cephalexin (80%), Norfloxacin (71%) and Nalidixic acid (72%) somewhat similar findings were reported by others (Rahman et al., 2009) while in comparison isolates of Proteus spp. and S. aureus besides showing high resistance to Ampicillin, Amoxyclav, Cephalexin had less resistance to other antibiotics used. The present study showed that most of the uropathogens were highly resistant to Ampicillin and Amoxyclav while resistance pattern to the other antibiotics vary with the organisms. It is quite serious problem that most of the organisms included in the study from UTI found resistant to multiple drugs. Antibiotic resistance has been emerged as the major problem in the uropathogenic organisms so treatment of UTI should not be advocated without urine culture and sensitivity performed. This would be helpful in proper treatment and preventing further development of resistant strains. REFERENCES Akram M., Shahid M., Khan A.U. (2007). Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community acquired urinary tract infections in J N M C hospital Aligarh, India. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrobiol.6(4): 1-7. Asad U. Khan. and Mohd S. Zaman (2006). Multiple drug resistance patterns in urinary tract infection patients in Aligarh. Biomed. Res.17(3): 179-181. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.45(4): 493-496. Gales A.C., Jones R.N., Turnidge J., Rennie T. and Ramphal R. (2001). Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates; occurance rates, antimicrobial susceptibility of pattern and molecular typing in the global SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program 1997-99. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32: 46-55. Habeeb Khadri and Mohammad Alzohairy. (2009). High prevalence of multi drug resistance (MDR) and extended spectrum β- lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria among community acquired urinary tract infections. J Bacteriol. Res. 1(9): 105-110. Hussain I., Sangama R.A. and Agrawal K.B. (2005). Bacterial etiology of urinary tract infections and their antibiogram observed in Assam. J. Microb. World. 7(2): 270-273. Kahlmeter G. (2003). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens in uncomplicated cystitis Europe. The ECO. SENS study. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents.20: 339-347. Kass E.H. (1956). Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract. Trans Sssoc. Am.Physicians.69. 56-64. Katsumi Shigemura, Kazushi Tank, Hiroshi Okada, Yuzo Nakan, Sohiro Kinoshit, Akinobu Gotah, Soichi Arakawa and Masato Fujisawa. (2005). Pathogen occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary tract infection cases during a 20-year period (1983-2002) at a single institution in Japan. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis.58: 303-308. Khan A.U. and Musharaff A. (2004). Plasmid mediated multiple antibiotic resistance in P. mirabilis isolated from the UTI patients. Med Sci Mon. 10, 598-602. Kumar M.S., Lakshmi V. and Rajagopalan R. (2006). Occurrence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriacae spp. isolated at a tertiary care institute. Ind. J. Med. Microb.24(3): 208-211. Manjunath G.N., Praksh R., Vamseedhar Annam. and Kiran Shetty. (2011). Changing trends in the spectrum of antimicrobial drug resistance pattern of uropathogens isolated from hospitals and community patients with urinary tract infections in Tumkur and Bangalore, Int. J. Biol. Med. Res.2(2): 504-507. Nadia Gul, Talat Y. Mujahid, and Samia Ahmad. (2004): Isolation, identification and antibiotic resistance profile of indigenous bacterial isolates from urinary tract infection patients. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 7(12):2051-2054. Rahman Farjana, Sadia Choudhary, Md. Majibur Rahaman, Dilruba Ahmad and Anowar Hossain. (2009). Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Gram negative bacteria causing urinary tract infection. J. Pharm. Sci.2(1): 44-50. Rawat Vinita, Umesh and Paul Priyanka. (2010). Antibiotic resistance pattern of urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli from Kumaun region NJIRM.1(4): 43-46. Tankhiwale S.S., Jalgaonkar V.S., Atimad S. and Hassani U. (2004). Evaluation of extended spectrum of beta lactamase in urinary isolates. Ind. J. Med. Res.120: 553-556. DAV International Journal of Science Volume-1, Issue-1 January, 2012
2004 The following is a list of the most commonly prescribed drugs. It represents an abbreviated version of the drug list (formulary) that is at the core of your pharmacy benefit plan. The listis not all-inclusive and does not guarantee coverage. In addition to using this list, you are Express Scripts encouraged to ask your doctor to prescribe generic drugs whenever appropriate. PLEASE NOT
Aplicaciones Industriales de los Taninos Vegetales Área Temática 3 – Promoción del Desarrollo Industrial Reunión de Áreas del Programa CYTED Royal Decameron Beach Resort, Golf, Spa & Casino • Panamá 18 a 19 de junio de 2007 Por iniciativa de la Secretaría General del Programa CYTED fue realizada la primera reunión de áreas, donde estuvieran p