Microsoft word - bowring.02.wpd
The Moral Dilemma of Management Procedures for Ectopic Pregnancy
Assoc. Prof. of Sacred Theology & Pastoral Catechetics
St. Mary’s Col ege of Ave Maria University
Is the fertilized egg a mass of cells, merely the products of conception (POCs) and
gestation, and a blob of tissue, or is it a human person? If it were the first, then there
would be no moral implications to consider in managing ectopic pregnancy. But since it
is indeed a fully human person, there are necessarily moral considerations in the situation
of an ectopic pregnancy. These moral considerations thus become vitally important
because, in the moral debate over management procedures for ectopic pregnancy
currently ensuing especially among Catholic theologians and medical doctors, we are
discerning the distinction between saving the life of the mother versus what is otherwise
murder of the unborn child masked under the auspices of saving the mother’s fertility. By
one medical doctor’s account, the debate currently ensuing between non-dissenting
Catholic theologians and doctors concerning management of ectopic pregnancy is
tantamount to the pre-Humanae Vitae
The purpose of this paper, then, is threefold: to provide a background on current
management procedures for ectopic pregnancy, to present the moral foundations and the
two sides of the current moral debate, and to make conclusions based on the moral
1 John E. Foran, M.D. “Ectopic Pregnancy: Current Treatment Options, déjà vu Humanae Vitae
The Linacre Quarterly
Vol. 66, no. 1 (Feb, 1999), 21f.
During the process of conception, the fallopian tubes normally serve as transport
passages for the egg (ovum) to meet the male sperm cell for fertilization. The fertilized
egg then implants within the womb (uterus) to establish the developing embryo. The
word “ectopic” means “out of place” (from the Greek - ek
, “out of,” and topos
An ectopic pregnancy is a potentially life-threatening form of pregnancy in which
implantation of the fertilized egg occurs outside the inner (endometrial) lining of the
uterus. Often called a "tubal pregnancy," most ectopic pregnancies (about 97%;
1.5% are abdominal, 0.5% are ovarian and 0.03% are cervical
2) occur in the fal opian
tubes. Since the fal opian tubes are not large enough to accommodate a growing
embryo, the pregnancy cannot continue normal y. The inner lining of the fal opian
tubes are coated with smal hair-like projections cal ed cilia. These cilia transport
the egg smoothly from the ovary through the fal opian tube and into the uterus. If
these cilia are damaged by infection or scarring, or there is partial blockage of
the fal opian tubes, ovum transport may become disrupted. The egg may settle
in the fal opian tube without reaching the uterus, thus becoming an ectopic
pregnancy. Sadly, at this time, even a viable ectopic fetus cannot be saved.
This paper wil discuss the management procedures utilized today for ectopic
pregnancy and the moral implications and dilemmas they present.
C. Risks Involved with the Condition of Ectopic Pregnancy
Ectopic pregnancy is a very serious condition. When the pregnancy grows in
these abnormal areas, it can easily cause massive, internal bleeding, and even
death for both mother and child. In some cases, the embryo grows until the
fal opian tube is stretched so much that the tube ruptures (usual y at 6-10 weeks
of gestation). Rupture of the tube is a true medical emergency because of
maternal hemorrhage (severe blood loss).
According to one source, there are varying health risks:
Some women spontaneously absorb their ectopic pregnancy with
no apparent il affects, and can be observed without treatment. The most
feared complication of an ectopic pregnancy is internal bleeding, causing
pelvic and abdominal pain, shock, and even death. Therefore, bleeding in
an ectopic pregnancy may require immediate surgical attention. Bleeding
results from the rupture of the fal opian tube, or from blood leaking from
the end of the tube as the growing placenta erodes into the veins and
arteries located inside the tubal wal . Blood coming from the tube can be
very irritating to other tissues and organs in the pelvis and abdomen, and
result in significant pain. The pelvic blood can lead to scar tissue
formation and problems with becoming pregnant in the future. The scar
tissue can also increase the risk of future ectopic pregnancies.3
2 http://www.advancedfertility.com/ectopic.htm (5/15/02).
Any growing pregnancy requires a large nutrient source (blood supply)
and develops many communications with the mother's (pregnant
woman's) vascular system (blood vessels). The uterus is uniquely
designed to accommodate this development, so that when a pregnancy
begins to grow in other surrounding structures the vascular
Furthermore, as the pregnancy grows in size the uterus dramatical y
changes shape and size. Surrounding structures are usual y not able to
change as readily so they are often damaged or "ruptured" by a contained
growing ectopic pregnancy. When the ectopic pregnancy outgrows the
limits of the space enclosing it, there can be life threatening
Types & Locations
There are some common sites for an ectopic pregnancy (see Diagram A) as fol ows:
1. In the fallopian tube
, also called a tubal pregnancy, whereby the embryo is
a. Ampullary (mid) portion of the fallopian tube (80-90%),
b. Isthmic (area closer to the uterus) portion of the fallopian tube (5-10%),
c. Fimbrial (distal end away from the uterus) portion of the fallopian tube
d. Cornual or interstitial
(within the uterine muscle) portion of the fallopian
2. Attached to the outer wall of the abdomen
(1-2%; may grow to term
morally should be permitted to advance so long as hemorrhaging is evaded,5 but
has a 20-fold higher mortality rate than tubal ectopic),
3. Attached to an ovary
(less than 1%; may grow to term
, thus surgical intervention
is not morally justified unless there exists imminent danger to the mother;6 partial
resection or removal of the ovary is then advised), or
4. In the cervix
(less than 1%; high risk of hemorrhage, thus packing of the cervix
and total hysterectomy may be required;7 with high mortality rate).8
4 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
5 Thomas J. O’Donnel, S.J. Medicine and Christian Morality
(New York: Alba House, 1996), 181.
According to one noted theologian, “The various accepted classifications of tubal
pregnancy, determined by the part of the tube in which nidation occurs are of no
particular importance in the moral consideration of tubal gestation”,9 which will be
Most ectopic pregnancies occur because the fertilized egg cannot pass through the
fallopian tube to the uterus. The egg is unable to pass through narrowed or blocked tubes.
Any condition that may have damaged the fallopian tubes increases a woman’s risk for an
ectopic pregnancy. There are several risk factors for ectopic pregnancy, which include the
8 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
_ Pelvic inflammatory disease (PIDs) or a history of pelvic
“Infection in the pelvis is another leading cause of ectopic pregnancy. Sexual y transmitted
organisms, such as chlamydia or gonorrhea, usual y cause pelvic infections. However, non-
sexual y transmitted bacteria can also cause pelvic infection and increase the risk of an ectopic
“Rate of ectopic pregnancy in women with previous known PID is increased 6-10 times
higher than in women with no previous history of PID. A published study of 745 women
with one or more episodes of PID that attempted to conceive showed that 16% were
infertile from tubal occlusion. Of those that conceived, 6.4% had ectopic pregnancies.
Pelvic inflammatory disease is usually caused by invasion of either gonorrhea or
chlamydia from the cervix up to the uterus and tubes. The infection in these tissues
causes an intense inflammatory response. Bacteria, white blood cells and other fluids
(pus) fill the tubes as the body combats the infection. Eventually, the body wins and the
bacteria are controlled and destroyed. However, during the healing process the delicate
inner lining of the tubes (tubal mucosa) is permanently scarred. The end of the tube by the
ovaries may become partially or completely blocked, and scar tissue often forms on the
outside of the tubes and ovaries. All of these factors can impact ovarian or tubal function
and the chances for conception in the future. If pelvic inflammatory disease is treated very
early and aggressively with IV antibiotics, the tubal damage might be minimized, and
fertility maintained.” http://www.advancedfertility.com/ectopic.htm (5/15/02).
11 Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is the single greatest risk factor. PID is an infection of the
female reproductive organs that can cause scarring of the organs.
_ Previous tubal pregnancy (repeat rate is about 12-15%, 30%
_ History of endometriosis _ Previous tubal surgery _ IVF13
12 “When an ectopic pregnancy in the falopian tube is treated conservatively (by preserving the
tube), there is a roughly 10 fold increase in ectopic pregnancy.”
“About 2-5% of clinical pregnancies are ectopic with IVF. The figure is higher for women
with a history of previous ectopic pregnancy or tubal infertility.” With regard to
heterotopic pregnancy (combined intra- and extra-uterine pregnancy), current rate is about
1/4000 pregnancies, but with IVF, rate is about 1/35-1/100 clinical pregnancies.
_ Failed or reversed tubal ligation14 _ Multiple induced abortions _ Pelvic adhesions (bands of scar tissue that constrict the
tube, most often a result of pelvic surgery)
_ Use of medications to stimulate ovulation
_ Use of progestin (releases progesterone) contraceptives such
an intrauterine device (IUD)—primarily because of the risk of
“After non-laparoscopic tubal ligation about 12% of pregnancies are ectopic. After
laparoscopic tubal coagulation about 51% of pregnancies are ectopic.”
Although rare, “approximately 50% of pregnancies in women using intrauterine devices (IUDs)
wil be located outside of the uterus.”
_ A fibroid tumor of the uterus _ Smoking (may damage the ampul a of the fal opian tube)16 _ Pelvic scar tissue (adhesions) _ Congenital defects in the structure of the tubes (e.g.
exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) in utero)
_ Hormonal imbalance (excessive levels of progesterone or
estrogen may interfere with the contractions of the fal opian
tube) from progesterone mini-pil s and post-coital estrogens
In addition to these known risk factors, according to one source, “It is
[also] important to note that women without any of these risk factors can
16 “In a recent study, researchers in France concluded the risk of an ectopic pregnancy is two-
thirds greater among women who smoke than among non-smokers. Among those women who
smoke at least ½ pack of cigarettes a day, the risk is double.” Wil iam G. Birch, M.D., L.L.D.
(hon). Pregnancy Book
(Chicago: Budlong Press, 2000), 40.
Ectopic pregnancy rates are rising. The rate of ectopic pregnancy rose from 4.5 to 16.8 per 1,000 pregnancies from 1970 to 1987.
per 1,000 reported pregnancies in the United States. Approximately
100,000 ectopic pregnancies occur each year. “Even in the absence of
known risk factors, ectopic pregnancy may occur as often as 1-2% of
pregnancies. If there are multiple risk factors, the risk may be 25% of
pregnancies,” according to one source.20 About 25% of al ectopic
pregnancies resolve themselves before a pregnancy has even been
the 19th century, mortality from ectopic pregnancies exceeded 50%. But
by the end of the 19th century, the mortality rate dropped to 5% because
of surgical intervention. With current advances in early detection, the
mortality rate has improved to less than 5 in 10,000. The survival rate
from ectopic pregnancies is improving even though the incidence of
ectopic pregnancies is also increasing. The major reason for a poor
outcome is failure to seek early medical attention.22 About 40-50 women
die each year from ectopic pregnancy in the U.S.
death is rare (less than 1 in 2500 cases).23 However, ectopic pregnancy is
stil one of the number one causes of death for women in the first
18 Michel E. Revlin, M.D., “Ectopic Pregnancy,” in Manual of Clinical Problems in Obstetrics and
, 4th ed, eds. Michel E. Revlin, M.D. and Rick W. Martin, M.D. (Boston: Little, Brown, &
20 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
21 http://www.ectopicpregnancy.com/facts.htm (5/15/02).
24 http://f.about.com/z/js/spr01.htm (5/15/02).
Symptoms of an ectopic pregnancy can often be vague and occur under
other conditions. Such symptoms include vaginal bleeding, abdominal or pelvic
pain (usual y stronger on one side), shoulder pain, weakness, or dizziness.
Weakness, dizziness, and a sense of passing out upon standing can represent
serious internal bleeding. However, some women have no symptoms (other
than those of pregnancy), making the diagnosis difficult at times.
Early diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy is critical y important in terms of
outcome. When an ectopic pregnancy is detected early in development,
especial y prior to rupture or damage to surrounding tissue, morbidity rates
decrease and treatment options are enhanced. There is currently no uniformly
accepted diagnostic protocol for the determination of an ectopic pregnancy.
a. Interview and examination by the doctor or gynecologist
. (Occasionally, the
doctor may feel a tender mass during the pelvic examination.)
b. Blood hormone tests (beta HCG and progesterone)25
c. Pelvic transcervical (vaginal) or abdominal ultrasound
d. Laparoscopy (a small, lighted camera inserted through small incisions below the
navel and/or near the pubic bone) to help confirm the diagnosis.26
These tests may take several days to complete, and the results may be
inconclusive. The timing of performing these tests and interpretation of test
results can be complicated, and should be directed by the obstetrician. When
checking blood hormone levels, such as beta human chorionic gonadotropin
(beta HCG) and progesterone, a series of blood samples are obtained. Beta
HCG levels normal y rise during pregnancy. An abnormal pattern in the rise of
this hormone can be a clue to the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. In those
with abnormal hormone patterns, an ultrasound can be performed. In patients
with an ectopic pregnancy, an ultrasound can demonstrate the absence of
Laparoscopy is the most direct method of visualizing an ectopic pregnancy. During laparoscopy, viewing instruments are inserted through smal incisions in the abdominal wal t
abdomen and pelvis, thereby revealing the site of the ectopic pregnancy. Usual y
a laparoscopy coincides immediately with surgery to remedy the problem due to
the increased risk factors if delayed. In rare instances, even laparoscopy may
not detect certain ectopic pregnancies because of their smal size or unusual
25 There is as of yet no ectopic pregnancy hormone that has been found which could make it
possible to determine this condition conclusively through a hormone test, but research is active in
this area. But, other hormone tests can be indicative. HCG, and in some cases progesterone,
rise during pregnancy. These tests can suggest an abnormal y growing intrauterine pregnancy or
26 Occasionaly, culdocentesis is done. In culdocentesis, a needle is inserted at the top of the
vagina, between the uterus and the rectum, to check for blood. The presence of blood may
indicate bleeding from a ruptured fal opian tube.
location.27 “Today, ectopic pregnancy is diagnosed and treatment is begun prior
to tubal rupture in over 80 percent of affected women.”28
Moral Foundations for Discerning Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
28 http://www.ectopicpregnancy.com/facts.htm (5/15/02).
According to St. Thomas Aquinas, the first precept of the moral law is that good is to
be done and evil avoided.29 All human activity should harmonize with the good of the
human race. The normative requirement of accomplishing harmony is that of loving God
and neighbor, for which grace is necessary. The negative precepts of natural law as
expressed in the Decalogue are universally valid and thus “oblige each and every
individual, always and in every circumstance.”30 Human acts are moral acts because they
determine the goodness or evil of the individual who performs them. Thus, we must
consider the teleological character of our actions, that is the “deliberate ordering of
human acts to God, the supreme good and ultimate end (telos) of man.”31 The moral
assessment of man’s free acts ordered to God are determined by the threefold sources of
morality, of 1) the intention (motive) of the acting subject, 2) the circumstances (and
consequences), and 3) the (moral) object itself of his act.32 With this in mind, however,
one must acknowledge the existence of moral absolutes, namely that “there are certain
specific kinds of behavior that are always wrong to choose, because choosing them
involves a disorder of the will, that is, a moral evil,”33 and thus good intentions and
circumstances are not in themselves always sufficient. This is what St. Paul refers to in
Romans when he says that it is never licit to do evil that good may come of it (3:8)
because some actions are by their very object intrinsically evil. In determining actions in
these situations, one will also remember that discerning and choosing truth is the
There are two principles that are commonly applied to ectopic pregnancy situations.
The first is the principle of totality, which “holds that we may sacrifice even a basic
bodily function or organ to preserve the whole of the bodily life provided there is no less
invasive way of achieving this goal.”34 Thus, it might be morally permissible to remove
the mother’s fallopian tube or a portion of it, which is causing harm to her life, to protect
the totality of her bodily life. But in certain circumstances, it might be acceptable for an
action to produce both a desired good effect and at the same time allow for certain evil
consequences in what is called the principle of double effect. There is a vital difference
between a directly willed effect and an indirectly willed effect. There are four conditions
for considering the principle of double effect:
1. The moral object may not be evil in itself; the moral act must itself be good or
2. The good and evil effect must proceed at least equally directly from the act (the
immediate effect must not be solely evil and the good effect should not physically
3. The agent may not intend or approve the evil effect.
4. There must be a proportionate grave reason in order to allow the evil effect.35
29 Wil iam May. An Introduction to Moral Theology
(Huntington: OSV, 1994), 47.
30 John Paul II, Encyclical Veritatis Splendor
(“The Splendor of Truth”) August 6, 1993, 52.
32 Catechism of the Catholic Church
, 2nd ed. (Rome: Liberia Editrice Vaticana
, 1997), 1750f.
34 Charles E. Cavagnaro III, M.D. “Treating Ectopic Pregnancy: A Moral Analysis,” The
Vol. 3, no. 6 (November, 1998), 5.
35 David Bohr. Catholic Moral Tradition
(Huntington: OSV, 1999), 226-227.
While even God never intends that evil be He, nevertheless, permits evil at times but
always for a greater good. In discerning a particular act, and having the “first goal of the
intention” in mind, it must be remembered that the ends do not justify the means.36 Every
act of means toward an end must itself be good or the whole act is evil.
Besides the necessity of natural law in considering the moral act, we should also
consider that man is a spiritual being who is capable of receiving faith, and thus receives
theological faith to live in obedience to the moral truths revealed by God. Of these truths
of divine Revelation, the Fifth Commandment, you shall not kill
, bears consideration
In regard to the sacredness and origin of human life, some in theology have tried to
argue that the actual beginning of human life has not yet been medically determined,37
and one medical source directly states, “Medical science defines the beginning of
pregnancy [not at the time of fertilization, but only after] the implantation of a fertilized
egg in the lining of a woman’s uterus.”38 Basically, this medical source seems to claim
that until the fertilized egg implants in the uterus, it is not considered the beginning of
human life; and thus, if it never makes it to the uterus, as in the case of ectopics, then the
claim is that conception did not take place. Whereas the Magisterium of the Catholic
Church has concluded in truth, “from the time the ovum is fertilized, a life is begun
which is neither that of the father nor the mother; it is rather the life of a human being
The evil of direct or induced abortion, for whatever reason, is a moral absolute.
“Procured abortion,” according to John Paul II in Evangelium Vitae
(“The Gospel of
”), “is the deliberate and direct killing, by whatever means it is carried out, of a
human being in the initial phase of his or her existence, extending from conception to
birth” (58) and this “direct and voluntary killing of an innocent human being is always
gravely immoral” (57). He goes on to say, “The killing of innocent human creatures (an
ectopic), even if carried out to help others (e.g., the mother), constitutes an absolutely
unacceptable act” (63). Dr. William May explains, “it is crucially important to recognize
that a dying person (the unborn baby in the ectopic) is still a person, whose life is to be
38 http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ecabt.html (5/30/02). The question to consider here is
whether there may be a distinction between the moment of conception and the moment that the
pregnancy official y begins, which is not until implantation in the uterus, according to this medical
source. This seems to be a false distinction.
39 John Paul II, Encyclical Evangelium Vitae
(“The Gospel of Life”), 60, citing “Declaration on
Procured Abortion.” Other statements from the Magisterium include: “”The human being is to be
respected and treated as a person from the moment of conception; and therefore form that same
moment his rights as a person must be recognized, among which in the first place is the inviolable
right of every innocent human being to life.” (“Respect for Human Life” I, 1.); “From the moment
of conception life must be guarded with the greatest care” (Vatican II, “The Church in the Modern
World” 51); “Since it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must be defended
in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any other human being” (CCC 2274).
respected and whose death, even if inevitable, is not to be hastened for the benefit of any
other person (the mother).”40 Therefore, any attempt to directly remove the living fetus,
even if it is deemed nonviable, as is eventually the case currently with tubal pregnancies,
has always been recognized by Catholic moral teaching as gravely immoral and
The Catholic teaching from U.S. Bishops on this issue has been controversial. There
have been two statements made by the Bishops of the United States, the first of which
40 Wil iam May, Ph.D. “Methotrexate and Ectopic Pregnancy,” Ethics & Medics
Vol. 23, no. 3
In extrauterine pregnancy the affected part of the mother (e.g., cervix, ovary, or
fallopian tube) may be removed, even though fetal death is foreseen, provided that
(a) the affected part is presumed already to be so damaged and dangerously affected
as to warrant its removal, and that (b) the operation is not just a separation of the
embryo or fetus from its site within the part (which would be a direct abortion from
a uterine appendage) and that (c) the operation cannot be postponed without notably
About this statement, Dr. May concludes, “This directive clearly authorizes as morally
licit the use of partial salpingectomy or total salpingectomy in order to safeguard the
mother’s life when there is grave danger of hemorrhaging from the fallopian-tube
pregnancy. But it also clearly excludes use of a salpingostomy. At the time this directive
was written, the management of tubal pregnancies by methotrexate was not known.”42
The more recent 1994 U.S. Bishops’ directive states more simply as follows: “In the
case of extrauterine pregnancy, no intervention is morally licit which constitutes a direct
abortion.”43 On the other hand, the document continues, “Operations, treatments and
medications that have as their direct purpose
the cure of a proportionately serious
pathological condition of a pregnant woman (i.e., a salpingectomy) are permitted when
they cannot be safely postponed until the unborn child is viable, even if they will result in
the death of the unborn child” (47, italics added). In a section on emergency
contraception, the new directive also states, “It is not permissible, however, to initiate or
to recommend treatments that have as their purpose or direct effect the removal,
destruction, or interference with the implantation of a fertilized ovum” (36). The current
theological debate seems to have two points of argument: first, what can be inferred from
newfound brevity in the 1994 U.S. Bishops’ directive versus the original 1971 directive;
and second, what constitutes a direct abortion? These questions shall be pursued later in
41 National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health
(Washington, D.C., NCCB, 1971), 16.
42 Wil iam E. May. Catholic Bioethics and the Gift of Human Life
(Huntington: OSV, 2000), 183.
43 National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Ethical and Religious Directives for Health Care
(Washington, D.C.: NCCB, 1994), 28.
Current Procedures and Moral Considerations for Managing Ectopic Pregnancy
When the diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy is made, treatment options need
to be considered. In some situations, emergency surgery is required to control
internal bleeding. If, however, the diagnosis is made early in the pregnancy and
prior to tubal rupture, other management options are available. In recent years
with the new ability to make an early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, there has
been a shift from saving the life of the mother (with the high mortality rates now a
consequence of the past) to saving the mother’s fertility. This new focus, while it
demonstrates laudable concern for the mother and her fertility, also presents
new moral considerations in regard to the ectopic baby.
three primary types of treatment options for managing ectopic pregnancy:
expectant management, surgery, and medication (chemical). Each wil briefly be
discussed now with their corresponding moral considerations.
One medical option for ectopic pregnancy is expectant management. This is
essentially based on observation and monitoring without active treatment, making no
interventions in hopes that the problem will resolve naturally without causing harm to the
mother. Estimates on the percentage of ectopic pregnancies that will resolve on their own
vary widely from 25% 44 to 60-65%.45 Understanding that the risk of expectant
management is rupture of the ectopic pregnancy (in 1 out of 3 cases46) during the
observation period and possibly death, “expectant management of an ectopic pregnancy is
generally discouraged,”47 according to one medical source.
44 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
45 J. Rock. “Ectopic Pregnancy,” TeLinde’s Operative Gynecology
, 1992, 420.
“Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy may be appropriate in selected situations. The risk of rupture for an ampul ary ectopic pregnancy is thought to be roughly 10% for circulating hCG
concentrations less than 1000 mIU/mL. The risk of rupture for an isthmic ectopic pregnancy is
thought to be about 10% for a circulating hCG concentration less than 100 mIU/mL (since the
space in which isthmic pregnancies must grow is far smal er than for ampul ary pregnancies).
Therefore, consideration of expectant management for an ectopic pregnancy when hCG
concentrations are low is possible… Criteria that are occasional y used in deciding on expectant
1. decreasing hCG titers on serial determinations
2. tubal location (rather than ovarian, abdominal, cervical)
3. no evidence of rupture or significant bleeding
4. ectopic mass with size less than 4 cm
5. highly motivated patient with strong desire to avoid both surgery and medical
Expectant therapy is sometimes a legitimate moral way of handling ectopic
pregnancy.48 If it involves an ectopic in the abdomen or ovary not yet hemorrhaging, then
expectant therapy is advised because the baby may grow to term. However, this
management procedure may at other times be imprudent and irresponsible. In still many
cases today, by the time ectopic pregnancy is diagnosed, the fallopian tube is already
damaged and causing danger to the mother’s life. Such a decision to engage in expectant
care would unnecessarily prolong and increase the risk of death to the mother. The fact
that the Church clearly allows for salpingectomy (a morally good act) to resolve the
problem also clearly calls for it in this situation to minimize what are otherwise further
unnecessary risks to the life of the mother, especially since the unborn child is nonviable
under current potential medical procedures available. As another point of consideration,
albeit secondarily, the blood flowing into the fallopian tube caused by an untreated
ectopic can lead to an increase of scar tissue formation and problems with becoming
Should the doctor however discover a tubal pregnancy that has advanced to a stage
approaching viability, expectant therapy is a good consideration. Thomas O’Donnell,
S.J., discussed the moral considerations as follows:
it is obvious that the element of proportion in the principle of double effect has to be
given very special consideration. In such a case special attention must be paid to
the proportion between the risk of expectant treatment for the mother and the
chances of soon delivering the viable fetus. Unless the danger to the mother notably
outweighs the chance for fetal survival, expectant treatment would be the procedure
First used in the 1980s as a management procedure for ectopic pregnancy,
Methotrexate, a mixture containing at least 85% of “4-amino-10-methylfolic acid,” is a
folic acid antagonist (reversibly inhibiting dihydrofolate reductase which normally
reduces folic acid to tetrahydrofolic acid), is usually administered in a single IM injection
dose, and consequently interferes with DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) synthesis and cell
reproduction51 in the trophoblastic tissue (the outer layer of cells produced by the
growing baby that connect it with its mother) of the developing fetus. Methotrexate
inhibits rapidly growing cells such as a pregnancy or some cancer cells.
pregnancy is not an approved FDA indication for methotrexate. FDA approved
uses of methotrexate include cancer treatment (including trophoblast disease,
breast cancers and leukemia), psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis.”52 Despite its
lack of FDA approval, the use of methotrexate has been gaining popularity
because of its high success rate (resolution in 70-95% of cases treated)53 and
low amount of side effects.54 If an unruptured ectopic pregnancy (tubal, cervical,
abdominal and cornual pregnancy) is discovered in early embryonic development
(less than 2-4 cm and the HCG is less than 1000-10,000mlU/ml), methotrexate is
currently an alternative medical procedure.
51 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
53 http://www.advancedfertility.com/ectopic.htm (5/15/02).
54 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
“Side effects were seen in about 5% of women and typical y included gastrointestinal upset
(stomatitis [oral ulcers], gastritis, diarrhea, transient elevation in liver enzymes). Significant side
effects involving bone marrow suppression, dermatitis and pleuritis have been very uncommon.”
In pregnancy, methotrexate destroys the
cel s/tissue. “Methotrexate management results in destruction of the growing
pregnancy but [its effects are] comparatively slow – often taking 4-6 weeks for
complete resolution of the ectopic pregnancy.”55 Medical management by this
method wil risk rupture
of the ectopic over this relatively long course of
Interesting to note, according to medical
literature, found on the internet at abortionclinic.com,56 Methotrexate, together
with misoprostol [a prostaglandin], is also commonly used today for medical
abortions of healthy in utero
babies. Working together, “methotrexate creates a
folic acid deficiency that stops cel division, resulting in termination of the
pregnancy. Misoprostol, the same prostaglandin that is used in conjunction with
RU 486, causes expulsion of the embryo”57 by stimulating uterine contractions.
55 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
56 http://www.gynpages.com/ (5/30/02). See also http://www.abortbypil .com/?source=overture
57 http://www.feminist.org/research/73_meth.htm (5/30/02). According to this web site of the
Feminist Majority Foundation, “the Methotrexate procedure is the only medical abortion method
that effectively terminates ectopic pregnancy” (bold added).
This medical procedure to have the mother ingest methotrexate to cause
miscarriage, is similar to the use of a ‘morning-after-pil ’ like RU-486 (Mifepristone),58
only at a later stage in fetal development.
Dr. John E. Foran, Coordinator of Internal Medicine
Education at St. Joseph Hospital in Chicago, in a February 1999 article in The Linacre
, has determined that both salpingotomy and methotrexate “carry the direct
effect of fetal termination,” though he acknowledges that there are also some
“supportive theologians [who] justify these actions under a laudable intention to
preserve both the health and fertility of the mother.”59
Catholic moral theologians disagree on the moral implications of the use of
methotrexate to manage ectopic pregnancy.60 Most recently, Peter Clark, S.J.,
Ph.D., in the February 2000 issue of The Linacre Quarterly
, argues in favor of
methotrexate by attempting to differentiate between the embryo and the placenta, or
the cytoblast and the trophoblast. He argues that methotrexate is destructive to the
trophoblast by stopping future protein synthesis, and that it stops the pathological
trophoblastic implanting process that is threatening the life of the mother, but that it
did not attack the life of the embryo directly. Under the conditions for the principle of
double effect, as a foreseen but non-directly intended effect, the cytoblast dies, while
the mother’s life is spared, according to his premise.61
But as Dr. May points out, the trophoblastic tissue “is a vital organ [and ‘must be
regarded as an integral part of the body of the unborn child’62 upon which it is “inextricably dependent”63 during gestation]… even though it is later discarded.
methotrexate ‘manage(s)’ the tubal pregnancy by lethal y invading the unborn child’s
body and effecting” its death.64 The obstetric literature and its definition of the
placenta seem to agree with Dr. May as wel . According to one medical definition of
the placenta, “The placenta is a complex tissue and should not be envisioned as
Early in gestation, the embryo is smal and has correspondingly smal
requirements for nutrients and for waste disposal systems - it subsists by
taking up endometrial secretions and dumping its metabolic wastes into
58 Mifepristone blocks the action of progesterone, which is necessary to sustain a pregnancy.
Without progesterone, the uterus wil not sustain the embryo, and since it wil not be able to
implant, it is then dislodged through the cervix.
60 Albert Moraczewski, O.P., Kevin O’Rourke, O.P., Patrick Norris, O.P., and others share Clark’s
view, while several eminent doctors, including Charles E. Cavagnaro III, M.D., Thomas W.
Hilgers, John Bruchalski, and Bernard Nathanson, share May’s view. See May, Catholic
65 http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/reprod/placenta/transport.html (5/15/02).
the lumen of the uterus. [But] this situation changes rapidly. As the
embryo grows and develops a vascular system, it must establish a much
more efficient means of obtaining nutrients and eliminating waste
products, and does so by establishing an efficient interface between its
vascular system and that of its mother. That interface is the placenta. In
addition to its primary goal of facilitating transport of nutrients and waste
products between mother and fetus, the placenta is also a major
(synthesizing and producing hormones).66
66 http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/reprod/placenta/ (5/15/02).
The chorionic epithelial cel s, which make up the trophoblast, are the outermost
layer of the fetal membrane, or the fetal extraembryonic membrane, but,
nevertheless, a vital part of the fetal membrane itself.67
during its metamorphosis. These are vital parts of the organism at this stage in
development, inseparable to the organism itself, though later discarded; and
when methotrexate destroys the vital organ of the trophoblastic tissue, it thus
kil s the embryo itself. Charles E. Cavagnaro III, M.D., in his article, “Treating
Ectopic Pregnancy: A Moral Analysis,” in the November 1998 issue of The
, clarifies that under the principle of totality we are not free to
sacrifice our vital organs68 needed to sustain life or those of the unborn baby for
that matter. Dr. May makes a conclusion:
Thus, the ‘therapeutic effect’ [of methotrexate] is achieved only by means
of its lethal effect on the unborn child. Moreover, the ‘therapeutic effect’
benefit the unborn child but the mother, and does so only
because its non-therapeutic effect destroys the trophoblast of the unborn
While Peter Clark, S.J., Ph.D. agrees that salpingostomy is a direct
abortion,70 key to his argument in favor of the use of methotrexate to al eviate a
tubal pregnancy is the argument that the change from the 1971 U.S. Bishops
directive to their 1994 directive implies a change in the implicit teaching of the
U.S. Bishops that certain procedures do not conform to the moral law.71 I think
this is an unsubstantiated argument. The clear point at hand is that the new
directive, while it is more simply stated, neither directly negates nor contradicts
the original directive. Perhaps, the simpler 1994 statement is purposeful y meant
to invite theologians and doctors to further investigate the truths
of these issues
of moral management procedures of ectopic pregnancy, and to present their
arguments so as to assist the Church in making a more definitive statement
regarding the moral implications of managing ectopics in the future. Thus, if this
For those who choose or require intervention, the most common treatment is surgery.
Surgery is the treatment of medical problems by mechanical means. This often involves
performing operations whereby malfunctioning or abnormal parts are removed or
repaired. This has traditionally required making large incisions to get to the part that
67 http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/reprod/placenta/structure.html (5/15/02).
70 Peter A. Clark, S.J., Ph.D. “Methotrexate and Tubal Pregnancies: Direct or Indirect Abortion?,”
The Linacre Quarterly
(Feb. 2000), 10.
needs the attention. The incision is the part of the operation that causes all the pain and
really contributes nothing to the patient's recovery. In the case of ectopic pregnancy,
surgery allows a rapid and usually definite resolution of the pregnancy. There is, however,
a new method of surgery that avoids many of the shortfalls of traditional surgical
methods. “Minimally invasive surgery is a new approach whereby the same operations
are done using specialized instruments designed to fit into the body through several tiny
punctures instead of one large incision. Instead of looking directly at the part of the body
being treated, the physician monitors the procedure via a special video camera called a
laparoscope inserted through one of the small punctures. By eliminating the large
incision, much of the pain of recovery can also be eliminated.”72
1. Two Surgical Methods
72 http://www.laparoscopy.com/pleatman/mis.htm (5/15/02).
Surgical treatment options for removal of an ectopic pregnancy partially depend on
the location of the ectopic pregnancy.73 There are primarily two surgical methods
available – laparoscopy and laparotomy. If surgery is decided upon, then the decision
must be made in terms of laparoscopy or laparotomy. This decision depends primarily on
the surgeon's expertise with laparoscopy and the operating room's laparoscopic
If ectopic pregnancy is treated surgically instead of medically, laparoscopy is the
surgical procedure most often indicated today. Laparoscopy involves inserting viewing
instruments (a laparoscope) into the pelvis through tiny incisions in the skin in or just
below the navel. Using the laparascope, the physician can remove or repair the fallopian
tube and thus remedy the ectopic pregnancy. The advantage of laparoscopy is in terms of
postoperative recovery for the woman having surgery. Generally, women prefer the
shorter recovery period, reduction in postoperative pain, and smaller incisions in the
abdomen associated with laparoscopy. If the tube has ruptured, the physician must
perform an emergency laparascopic procedure. He will then perform a laparotomy. 74
Laparotomy is an open procedure whereby a transverse (bikini) incision is made
across the lower abdomen (approximately 5 cm) and a salpingectomy is usually
performed while a salpingostomy might be the option as well. It should be emphasized
that either approach (laparoscopy or laparotomy) is medically and morally acceptable and
capable of achieving the goals of decreasing morbidity and increasing future fertility.
The decision on whether a laparoscopy or laparotomy is to be performed depends on
the specific clinical details, the couple's desires, the surgeon's laparoscopic expertise, and
73 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
74 Certain conditions make laparoscopy less effective or unavailable as an alternative. These
include massive pelvic scar tissue and excessive blood in the abdomen or pelvis. In some
instances, the location or extent of damage may require removal of a portion of the fal opian tube,
the entire tube, the ovary, and even the uterus.
the operating room's equipment. The same type of surgery would be done regardless of
the size of the incisions made to perform the surgery. In cases where the ectopic
pregnancy is already ruptured, surgery is the only option. If the woman has a ruptured
ectopic pregnancy and she is hemodynamically unstable, then surgery is required and a
laparotomy is performed with a salpingectomy regardless of whether significant damage
to the tubal lumen is suspected. The removal of the damaged tube allows rapid control of
bleeding and the best chance for continued hemostasis throughout the postoperative
period. If the woman has a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and is hemodynamically stable,
then surgery is required and laparoscopy is not absolutely contraindicated. But, if the
surgeon identifies an ectopic by laparoscopy and is not comfortable performing the
necessary surgery on the ectopic pregnancy site through the laparoscope, then the
appropriate decision is to perform the surgery by laparotomy. The surgeon in this
situation would hopefully have counseled the patient preoperatively that if necessary he
would proceed to definitive management by laparotomy.
2. Three Types of Surgery
There are three types of surgery for managing ectopic pregnancy: a salpingectomy, a
fimbrial expression procedure,
or a salpingotomy.
a salpingectomy is performed, the fallopian tube
is cut out.
In management of ectopic
pregnancies today, if future fertility is of no concern, the tube is ruptured
, it has
irreversible damage, there is overt hemorrhage, there is significant anatomic
, severe damage, or if a woman is medically unstable, a salpingectomy is
usually performed. Besides simply removing the entire fallopian tube, another option
might be a partial salpingectomy with a segmental resection whereby the surgeon
only cuts out the affected portion of the tube. A partial salpingectomy may either be
a tubocornual anastomosis (the portion of the tube containing the ectopic is removed, and
the remaining portion is reattached to the uterus) or a tubotubal anastomosis (a section of
the tube is removed and the two severed pieces are then stitched back together) and is
usually recommended for an unruptured ectopic in the isthmic portion of the tube (since it
causes scarring and subsequent narrowing of the small lumen). However, there is data
suggesting that repaired tubes have a higher rate of recurrent ectopic pregnancy (in the
Since in ectopic pregnancy, the tube has become pathological, according to the principle of double effect it w
indirect result of an attempt to save the life of the mother. Under what has become
known as the “Bouscaren approach”, named for its proponent, T. Lincoln Bouscaren, S.J.,
who first applied the principle of double effect to ectopic pregnancy, and this proposal
has become generally accepted by Catholic moral theologians.76
threatening risk to the mother, which is usually the case by the time the ectopic is
discovered. Second is the moral question of the tubal-saving procedure of anastomosis,
75 http://www.ectopicpregnancy.com/facts.htm (5/15/02).
76 T. L. Bouscaren, Ethics of Ectopic Operations
, 2nd ed. (Milwaukee: n.p., 1944), 102, cited in
which medical findings conclude causes an increase in the risk of future ectopics.77
About this, Father O’Donnell, concluded, “the probability of such a risk must be weighed
against the total removal of the tube, particularly if the patient has a remaining intact
tube.”78 Considering that a child is a gift and not a right, it is important to note that if a
mother has undergone a salpingectomy and the other tube is normal, there is still a good
chance of conception taking place, although it may take a little longer.79
77 http://www.advancedfertility.com/ectopic.htm (5/15/02).
Though “salpingostomy gives a higher delivery rate (76% vs. 44% in one study) and also a
higher risk of recurrent ectopic than would salpingectomy”, partial salpingectomy
increases the chances of future ectopics dramatically.
79 http://www.ectopicpregnancy.com/facts.htm (5/15/02).
One procedure for ectopic pregnancy is known as "milking" the pregnancy out the end of the tube. This procedure is sometimes considered with ectopic pregnancies that are located in
tube (about 5% of ectopics).
This procedure can damage the tubal lumen and
cause unnecessary bleeding, and thus is medical y discouraged.80 Moral Considerations
One moral theologian, Jesuit Father Thomas J. O
as fol ows: “In regard to ‘milking’ of the embryo out of the distal end of the tube… [the] question of fertility salvage and maternal risk is clearly moot. The
direct removal of an embryo or fetus [as with salpingostomy] from its site of
implantation (except under circumstances of its viability…) is clearly the direct
infliction of a lethal blow which is, in turn, directly destructive of the fetal life.”81
A salpingotomy is the surgical procedure whereby a smal incision is made in the fal opian tube and the ectopic pregnancy is
the fal opian tube intact, or if needed, repaired. The surgeon then has two
options in finishing the surgery. Salpingotomy occurs when the serosal defect in
the fal opian tube is closed with fine, non-reactive, interrupted sutures.
Salpingostomy takes place when the serosal defect in the fal opian tube is left
open so that it can close by secondary intention – “on its own.” There is
nonconclusive evidence that suturing the incision on the tube closed or leaving it open is
better,82 but when
the tissue is not sewn shut, the hope is that this al ows the tissue
80 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
Persistent ectopic pregnancy: If the tube is saved at surgery, there is some risk that some
of the pregnancy remains in the tube. This tissue can persist and resume growing. A mass
can form with subsequent rupture and hemorrhage. Case reports of patients who
developed symptoms after conservative surgery have generally been at least 10 days after
to close itself minimizing the risk of further scarring; i.e., to decrease the risk of
future ectopic pregnancy due to scarring. Even after a surgery that removes the
embryo, “persistent trophoblast (placental) tissue can [be left behind and] grow
at the ectopic site and require further active management if the fal opian tube is
saved. This occurs about 5-10% of the time,”83 in which case, methotrexate is
often given to eliminate the remaining tissue.
surgery. Incidence of persistent ectopic: After laparotomy: 3-5% of cases, after
laparoscopy: 3-20% of cases (most reports at 5-10%). The best approach is to follow the
woman with weekly HCG levels until negative. If a persistent ectopic is diagnosed,
methotrexate therapy is usually the treatment of choice.
83 http://www.drdaiter.com/hyst_ecto/ecto1.html (5/15/02).
Thomas J. O’Donnel , S.J., argued that while dangerously damaged
(fal opian tube), has always been recognized in the teaching of the Church as a
grave moral evil… [A]borting a fetus from a fal opian tube is no different than
aborting it from the uterus itself.”84 He further argued that justifying any surgical
procedure to solve the problem of an ectopic pregnancy “must be based on the
presumption that the tube itself is so pathological y affected here and now that
surgical intervention on the tube itself is indicated.”85
some Catholic theologians today are trying to legitimize linear salpingotomy
based on their attempts to apply the principle of double effect. Jean de Blois,
C.S.J., et al, feel that in regard to both salpingotomy and methotrexate,
“[a]lthough the action that corrects the pathology, whether surgical or medical, is
the same action that brings about the death of the embryo, that death is not the
direct effect that is intended.”86 Another proponent of this perspective is Albert
Moraczewski, O.P., who argues that the doctor’s intent in performing a
salpingostomy is “to preserve the health
and life of the mother,”87 and thus the
main distinction between salpingectomy and salpingostomy is real y in saving of
At issue here is that, in practice, the evil effect of directly removing or kil ing of the embryo is the direct means to the good effect of saving the mother
of double effect. According to Moraczewski’s perspective, “the specific objective
and good of that act is the removal of the damaged tissue and the stopping of
the enzymatic activity of the trophoblast [whereby]… The embryo, of course, is
necessarily also removed in the process.”88 But others argue that
salpingostomy is indeed a direct and lethal attack on the body of the unborn
child. “The direct act of removing the conceptus from the fal opian tube, be it by suction, forceps, or toxin, is the cause of the wel intended health of the mother…
Therefore, since the immediate effect of methotrexate and salpingotomy
(ostomy) is the death of the fetus, the principle of double effect is not applicable
84 O’Donnel , Medicine
86 J. de Blois, P. Norris, K. O’Rourke. A Primer for Health Care Ethics: Essays for a Pluralistic
(Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press, 1994), xi, 255, p. 23.
87 Albert S. Moraczewski, O.P. “Ectopic Pregnancy Revisited,” Ethics & Medics
Vol. 23, no. 3
because the act is evil,” according to Dr. Foran.89 Dr. Hilgers, M.D., adds that he sees “no difference between… a salpingostomy and [a] D&C entering through
the cervix to remove the embryo and placental tissue”90 in a normal pregnancy.
“removal” of the fetus whereby in the latter of which they claim the death of the
embryo is not intended.91 Dr. May critiques their position as “euphemistic,”
pointing out the clear distinction between an act of medical intervention that is
performed on the mother
to save her life (salpingectomy) versus an act of
abortion under the auspices of a “removal” that is performed on the child
to kil it
90 Quoted by May, “Methotrexate,” 2.
91 Germain Grisez. Abortion: The Myths, the Realities, and the Arguments
Books, 1970), 340-341; Joseph Boyle. “Double Effect and a Certain Kind of Craniotomy,” Irish
44 (1977); and Patrick Lee, Abortion and Unborn Human Life
I similarly hold that managing ectopic pregnancies by the use of
salpingostomy and methotrexate constitutes direct abortion, i.e., abortion as
kil ing, inasmuch as these procedures are lethal and are performed on the
body person of the unborn child; they are performed on it, not for its good, but
for the good of the mother; moreover, they are not necessary
to save her life
if this is jeopardized by the tubal pregnancy inasmuch as her life can be
Thus, it is rightly argued that methotrexate, and salpingostomy like it, is a direct
After examining al the arguments in the moral debates on management procedures for e
evidence that the ectopic is not yet causing imminent harm to the life of the
mother or when it appears the baby may even come to term. In regard to the
tubal-saving procedure of anastomosis in that of a partial salpingectomy, which
medical findings conclude causes an increase in the risk of future ectopics,93
there is great concern as to whether it is worthwhile to save the tube, especial y if
there is another good tube, in hopes of saving that tube’s fertility potential, al the
while, knowing that such a procedure causes the risk of future ectopics.
In regard to expectant therapy, the danger of the rampant escalation of threat to the life of the mother which is possible must be weighed proportionately to the moral justification of the alternative management
procedure of performing a salpingectomy to remedy the condition. Al points
considered, and although not yet definitively declared to be so by the Catholic
Church’s teaching authority, salpingostomy, fimbrial expression, and
methotrexate, by legitimate accounts and sound principles, are directly abortive
procedures and thus deemed immoral. Until the Magisterium makes a definitive
statement on this issue, some theologians are al too quick in applying the
principle of probabilism, simply because there exists two sides to this moral
argument.94 On the contrary, according to the former executive director of the
U.S. Bishops’ Doctrine and Pastoral Practices office, J. A. DiNoia, O.P., while
“Conscientious of the moral issues involved (in tubal pregnancy), the (Catholic)
Church judiciously deliberates on these issues before promulgating a definitive
statement,” and therefore, in the meantime, he agreed, “the Church’s wel spring
of moral teachings can act as a guide in such matters;”95 and for many
theologians and doctors, the wel spring of existing Church teaching is clear
In reality, the arguments in favor of methotrexate and salpingostomy, while avoiding research on the plausibility of transplantation, real y serve
with unambiguous teaching from the Magisterium,” suggests Dr. Foran, a
sentiment shared unanimously by theologians on both sides of the debate.
think it is unequivocal y better in the meantime to favor the definitive Church-
approved procedure of salpingectomy, which is clearly not an evil act, over any
other surgical or medical procedure so dramatical y debated today even among
sound Catholic theologians, and of which could at anytime be definitively
declared immoral by the Church, as some expect.
salpingotomy (especial y if the method used is a laparoscopy) is the choice of
management, Dr. Foran asks, “Does Mother Church wish the conceptus
baptized before or after its [so-cal ed] ‘gentle removal’?”97 On the other hand, in
the case of a salpingectomy, baptism is possible and can easily be the priority,
93 http://www.advancedfertility.com/ectopic.htm (5/15/02).
Though “salpingostomy gives a higher delivery rate (76% vs. 44% in one study) and also a
higher risk of recurrent ectopic than would salpingectomy”, partial salpingectomy
increases the chances of future ectopics dramatically.
94 Foran mentions this problem and argues against it (p. 27), while Clark actual y tries to apply the
argument (p. 18). The principle of probabilism has been defined by concluding that “if the
lawlessness of an action is doubtful one may fol ow a solidly probable opinion which favors liberty
of action, even if the opposite is more probable.” Thomas O’Donnel , S.J. Morals in Medicine
(Westminister, MD: The Newman Press, 1960), 25.
95 Quoted in Kel y Bowring, “Our Story: Facing the Moral Dilemma of an Ectopic Pregnancy,”
National Catholic Register
Vol. 75, no. 35 (August 29, 1999), 9.
as was indicated by Dr. Cavagnaro,98 and as it was when my wife and I had our
ectopic pregnancy (we had the nurse who assisted the doctor baptize our baby)
at the time of my wife’s salpingectomy.99
possibility of saving both the life of the mother and the life of the baby when he
says, “it is moral y imperative today to make every effort possible to discover and
transplant into the uterus those unborn babies who have, unfortunately,
implanted in the fal opian tube or other ectopic site.”100 But perhaps, as is the
case with embryonic stem cel research, the focus is on the cutting edge of
science, divorced from its moral implications, and thus while surgical and
medical advances move forward to save not only the mother but her fertility, the
possibility of actual y saving the life of the child in the precarious position of an
ectopic pregnancy is hardly given a chance for consideration in modern medical
research. What is remarkable is that medical records report two successful
transplantations of an ectopic into the mother’s uterus, by Dr. C. J. Wal ace, and
even more remarkably, these took place in 1915 and 1917!101 Unfortunately,
according to May, this procedure was not attempted successful y again until
1980, and is rarely even considered today.102 He concludes by saying that,
“[s]ince it is possible to save their lives in this way and at the same time care for
their mothers, surely there is an obligation to attempt their transplantation from
99 Bowring, 9. As this article discusses in more detail, while seeking medical assistance at a
Catholic hospital, salpingostomy was the only surgical procedure offered to us; and I had to insist
that the doctors instead perform a salpingectomy, which in the end they referred to as archaic and
unnecessarily harsh to the mother’s future fertility, but hesitatingly in the end agreed to perform.
100 May, “The Management of Ectopic Pregnancies: A Moral Analysis,” The Fetal Tissue Issue:
Medical and Ethical Aspects
(The Pope John Center, 1994), 131, 146.
101 O’Donnel , Medicine
, 180; May, “The Management of Ectopic Pregnancy,” 132.
102 May, “The Management of Ectopic Pregnancies,” 132.
fal opian tube to womb.”103 This needs to be reconsidered and pursued,
especial y with the certainty that it is not just plausible, but possible. Convincing
the medical field to focus on re-implantation is the true moral imperative in the
issue of managing ectopic pregnancy today.
BCBSNC Medication DedicationSM Copay Waiver Drug List (2007)* DRUGS TO TREAT HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE AND OTHER CARDIOVASCULAR CONDITIONS AMILORIDE/HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE (Generic for Moduretic) BISOPROLOL FUMARATE (Generic for Zebeta) LABETOLOL (Generic for Trandate, Normodyne) METOPROLOL SUCCINATE (Generic for Toprol XL) DIURETICS METOPROLOL TARTRATE (Generic for Lopressor) SPIRONOLAC
Animal Specialty & Emergency Center 1535 S. Sepulveda Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 473-5906 $2,581.02 $2,751.00 If your pet is hospitalized longer than 48 hours, a hospital representative will call you with an updated estimate on a daily basis. Future medical services such as: X-rays, treatments, etc. are NOT included in this estimate. _____________These are estimated fees